Home
» Wiki
»
Why are flagship phones just as prone to scratches as cheap phones?
Why are flagship phones just as prone to scratches as cheap phones?
Tech companies make bold claims every year that their latest flagship phones are much more durable. Yet many high-end phones are just as prone to scratches and cracks as their budget counterparts. Why?
Why isn't the glass on flagship phones more durable than on budget models?
If you're spending thousands of dollars on a phone, you want to make sure it not only holds up over time, but also looks like new for a long time. After all, part of what you're paying for is extra durability — at least in theory.
In reality, the glass on flagship phones isn't significantly more durable than the glass on budget phones. You can easily find phones with the same level of protection for half the price.
The $499 Galaxy A56, for example, comes with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on the front and back, the same glass used on the previous $1,199 flagship S22 Ultra.
This is because there is an inverse relationship between scratch resistance and crack resistance, as scratch resistance is a result of hardness while crack resistance is a result of flexibility. You cannot make a piece of glass both more bendable and harder at the same time.
In other words, if Corning wants to make its Gorilla Glass more scratch-resistant, the company will inevitably have to sacrifice some of its crack resistance, and vice versa. And as a rule, Corning prioritizes impact resistance over scratch resistance.
The idea is that a crack does more damage and can render the device unusable, while a scratch may not damage the functionality of the screen. That's something we can't deny.
Of course, there's more to a flagship than just its claimed durability. But if durability is one of the main reasons you buy a high-end phone, think again. No matter how expensive your phone is, it can still scratch at a level 6 with deep, more noticeable grooves at a level 7 on the Mohs scale.