Updated: November 11, 2026, at 10:21 a.m. in Mesa, Arizona (MST, UTC−07:00; 5:21 p.m. UTC).
An ICE charter flight carrying at least nine Iranian nationals reportedly returned to Mesa, Arizona, on Tuesday, November 10, after Pakistan refused to receive the group. The New York Times, citing a U.S. official and a relative of one of the detainees, reported that the aircraft turned back about 30 minutes after departure and that the passengers were returned to immigration detention in Arizona. Neither the exact clock time nor a detailed official explanation for Pakistan’s reported decision has been made public.
The reported refusal appears to be the immediate operational reason the flight could not continue on its planned route through Pakistan toward Iran. It is separate from a different flight attempt on Sunday, November 8, which was canceled while the plane was still on the ground in Arizona. The distinction matters: the Sunday flight’s cancellation was reported without an explanation, while Pakistan’s refusal was cited as the reason for Tuesday’s midair turnaround.
Reporting places the return on Tuesday, November 10, 2026, at Phoenix–Mesa Gateway Airport in Mesa, Arizona. The New York Times reported that the plane had taken off carrying at least nine Iranian nationals and turned back roughly half an hour later. The same report said the detainees were taken off the aircraft and returned to an Arizona immigration detention facility.
The exact departure and landing times have not been published in the sources available for this update. The event date is reported as Tuesday, November 10, in Mesa, Arizona, which uses Mountain Standard Time (MST, UTC−07:00) in November. Because the clock time is unconfirmed, it would be misleading to assign a precise local time or UTC time to the turnback.
The immediate explanation in the available reporting is that Pakistan reportedly denied entry to the flight or would not accept the detainees. The planned route was to take the group from Arizona to Pakistan, with a later transfer to Iran. Once Pakistan would not receive the group, the charter could not proceed as planned and returned to its Arizona starting point.
That answer has an important limit: the public reporting does not establish why Pakistan refused the arrival. A Pakistan Foreign Ministry spokesperson declined to comment, according to the report, and no detailed official explanation from U.S. authorities has been published alongside the account. The reported refusal is therefore the clearest explanation for the turnaround, but the diplomatic or operational reason behind it remains unconfirmed.
The distinction between a flight’s immediate cause and the reason behind that cause is useful here. “Pakistan would not receive the group” describes the reported event that disrupted the route. It does not tell readers whether the decision involved landing permission, transit arrangements, documentation, diplomatic negotiations, or another factor. Those details should not be filled in by speculation.
No. The Associated Press reported that at least eight Iranian detainees boarded a separate aircraft in Mesa on Sunday, November 8, for a proposed route through Georgia and Pakistan. Their attorney said that attempt was canceled before takeoff and that the group was moved back to detention; he said no reason was provided. Lawyers had separately said 11 people were scheduled for that earlier operation, so the reported count for the Sunday plan is not the same as the “at least nine” reported aboard Tuesday’s flight.
Tuesday’s aircraft did depart and then turn back. The Sunday plane did not complete takeoff, according to the AP account. Treating the events as one failed flight can blur the timeline and make the reason for each disruption appear more certain than it is.
The attempted removals were unfolding amid a federal case brought by the Iranian American Legal Defense Fund. The dispute concerns government contacts with Iranian officials and the handling of confidential information about Iranian asylum seekers. The organization argued that some detainees could face serious danger if returned to Iran. Those are claims in ongoing litigation, not findings about every person on the Tuesday flight.
A judge’s notice instructions and the legal challenge form important background, but they do not explain Pakistan’s reported refusal. The public docket shows that the court denied the fund’s request for a preliminary injunction on October 20; news reports later described separate advance-notice instructions for planned removals. That means the case should not be summarized as a blanket court order stopping every deportation flight. The public information reviewed here does not establish that a court order caused Tuesday’s plane to turn back.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has previously said it does not comment on prospective removal operations, including flight schedules, passenger manifests, destinations, or individual case details. That policy helps explain why independent reporting and court filings provide much of the available detail, but it does not independently confirm the account of Tuesday’s return.
Several points are supported by the current reporting: the charter left Mesa on Tuesday, November 10; it returned after about 30 minutes; the reported destination plan involved Pakistan before onward transfer to Iran; and the detainees were taken back to Arizona detention. The reported trigger was Pakistan’s refusal to receive the group.
Still unclear are the precise takeoff and landing times, the exact number of people on the Tuesday aircraft beyond the report of at least nine, the specific basis for Pakistan’s refusal, and whether or when another removal attempt will be scheduled. The flight’s return means this particular trip did not complete the planned removal. It does not by itself establish a change in the detainees’ immigration cases or rule out a future attempt.
Reports said Pakistan refused to receive the Iranian detainees, so the charter returned to Mesa. Officials have not publicly detailed the reason for Pakistan’s reported decision.
It reportedly returned on Tuesday, November 10, 2026, about 30 minutes after departing Mesa. An exact clock time has not been confirmed.
The available reporting does not say a judge ordered Tuesday’s aircraft to return. A separate Sunday flight was canceled before takeoff, and the court case is related background rather than a confirmed cause of Tuesday’s turnaround.
Sources: The New York Times report on Tuesday’s flight; Associated Press report on the separate Nov. 8 attempt; ABC News report on the court hearing and notice instructions; Public docket for Iranian American Legal Defense Fund v. Rubio.
Nineteen David Jones stores are expected to close by year-end. Here’s what shoppers should know about gift cards, returns and paid online orders.
Severe storm warnings and forecast risks vary by region in Australia. Get Bureau of Meteorology updates, shelter and flood safety advice, and outage guidance.
David Jones will close 19 stores across Australia and New Zealand by year-end. See the confirmed locations, expected timeline and what remains undecided.
The Bureau of Meteorology forecasts storms across several regions on November 12, with severe weather possible in southeast Queensland and parts of New South Wales.
Fallout 5 is in preproduction on Creation Engine 3, but Bethesda has announced no release date, platforms, or PC requirements. Here’s what UK gamers should—and shouldn’t—buy now.
Fallout 5 remains in preproduction, with no release date or platforms confirmed. Here is Bethesda’s latest status update and what it means for UK players.
Bethesda says Fallout 5 is in preproduction on Creation Engine 3, with The Elder Scrolls VI its main focus. Here is what is confirmed—and what remains unknown.
An ICE charter carrying Iranian detainees reportedly returned to Mesa after Pakistan refused the group. Here’s what’s known, what remains unclear and how it differs from an earlier canceled flight.
Kyle McCord is in line for his first Dolphins start after Malik Willis went on IR. See his profile, NFL fit, Colts kickoff time and what it could mean for Miami’s 2027 draft.
Miami placed Malik Willis on injured reserve, opening the door for Kyle McCord to start against Indianapolis. Here’s what the move means for the Dolphins’ QB depth chart.
